|
Post by 76trojan on Aug 13, 2018 2:06:49 GMT
On a whim, I compared a restaurant item’s online nutritional information found on its website against the info listed for the item on the Weight Watchers app, MFP, and on the calorie counting choice of iTrackBites. Results? Drum roll....Weight Watchers was the only one whose nutritional information exactly matched the nutritional information found on the restaurant’s website.
|
|
Kitty
Transcendent Member
Posts: 1,448
|
Post by Kitty on Aug 13, 2018 4:50:26 GMT
Restaurants and manufacturers change their nutritional info all the time due to small changes in how something is met. WW, MFP, etc. all sometimes get out of date. FWIW, most of the time if there has been recent change I have found WW behind on it, although not always. MFP relies mostly on users to correct it and some do it faster than others. If it is something that isn't that common, especially, I always check new foods against the manufacturer's website and often have to make changes to nutritional info on MFP (which any user can do). On WW it is often less important as most differences don't change the point count.
|
|
|
Post by Jennifer on Aug 13, 2018 11:41:47 GMT
On WW it is often less important as most differences don't change the point count. That's relevant... but I've lost the little faith I had in the scanner, more often than not I find it to be wrong.
|
|
|
Post by zazzles on Aug 13, 2018 13:16:01 GMT
That's relevant... but I've lost the little faith I had in the scanner, more often than not I find it to be wrong. Oh...the scanner. Don't get me started on that thing. The scanner just looks up a bar code by number. If it is missing from the database (as too many are), then WW offers members the option of "crowdsourcing" the data by entering it on the spot. Tnat COULD be fine...but it ISN'T. Because too many members don't see any good reason to enter information accurately and precisely as the label states it. If they don't count carbs, they may leave out the carbs. If they are savvy that the SP formula only uses calories, satfat, sugars and protein, they may only enter thouse four datapoints. And there may be many, many entries in the crowdsourced data for the same thing. The MyNetDiary app works somewhat differently. If you scan a barcode and the food isn't in the database, you have the option of submitting it. You enter the data, but you must snap a photo of the NI panel. The MyNetDiary staff then verifies your entry against the photo. And unverified entries are clearly marked so users can decide whether to trust them or not.
|
|
|
Post by lavonm on Aug 13, 2018 14:56:28 GMT
On a whim, I compared a restaurant item’s online nutritional information found on its website against the info listed for the item on the Weight Watchers app, MFP, and on the calorie counting choice of iTrackBites. Results? Drum roll....Weight Watchers was the only one whose nutritional information exactly matched the nutritional information found on the restaurant’s website. I wouldn't assume that to be the case all the time. Sometimes you get lucky. I've found it to be wrong a lot. It's hard for any app to stay on top of all the restaurants & any changes they might make to their dishes so I'm not criticizing. Using each restaurant's website takes more time but you're more likely to get up-to-date info.
|
|
|
Post by zazzles on Aug 13, 2018 17:51:46 GMT
To be honest, the NI that a restaurant puts out and what you get served may bare little relation to each other anyway. I doubt that line cooks in big restaurants weigh and measure everything as they go along. I'm sure that some pre-portioning is done before the day begins, but who knows how the planned recipes translate to reality. Because I take so many cooking classes with actual chefs who work in restaurant and commercial kitchens, I've heard and seen first-hand how "creative" they say they are in terms of subbing butter for oil, liberally salting foods, etc.
|
|
|
Post by alias123 on Aug 13, 2018 21:23:50 GMT
I've heard and seen first-hand how "creative" they say they are in terms of subbing butter for oil, liberally salting foods, etc. And it's never on the healthier side of the ledger.
|
|