|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 4, 2018 22:23:00 GMT
I wonder if we will ever know the full truth. I also believe Woodward, and we all know the JA and those around him can't be believed about anything. There seems to be no one left in the R party who cares at all. They have all sold their souls to the Devil.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 4, 2018 23:35:03 GMT
Sometimes, I think, JA, his family, staff & GOP supporters are even to evil for the devil .....
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 5, 2018 14:02:23 GMT
Another incumbent Democratic Congressman has lost the primary to a challenger who is a woman. This time in Massachusetts. Maybe the DNC will start getting the message that we need fresh faces and fresh ideas. From what I read, she didn't claim that she would vote differently than the current Congressman but that she better recognized the danger from the JA, and would fight against that harder. Sounds like exactly the kind of person we need in Congress. The more I hear about Woodward's book the more I want to read it. It's going to be a huge best seller. I just hope that people on the fence will heed his warning. The JA followers are simply going to say it's all lies. But we all know that. The JA who earlier said Woodward is always "fair", is now saying he's totally not credible and has had a lot of failures. The standard JA line about anything he disagrees with. I don't think anyone would have expected otherwise from this blowhard. But the thing is while Omarosa doesn't have much credibility, Bob Woodward has credibility oozing out his pores. It would be a hard task to find anyone more credible, and the majority of the American people know that.
Isn't it typical of this narcissistic idiot that he agreed to Woodward taping their phone conversation? Really, the man constantly steps all over himself. It's really mind boggling that he ever made any money at all, and completely understandable how he went broke so many times. LOL!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2018 14:33:06 GMT
Woodward book, puts abit more credibility to Omarosa's book & the Fire & Fury author, since they all pretty much describe a WH & JA out of control. But, Yes, totally agree Woodward's book IMHO kind of puts the last nail in the coffin so far. I think most people trust Woodward & know he wouldn't "make things up". We haven't heard much from Omarosa lately. I thought she had 200+ tapes & videos. I wonder if she just isn't being booked on shows anymore because her credibility is in question or if she was slapped with a lawsuit to shut up?
|
|
|
Post by lani on Sept 5, 2018 14:39:58 GMT
@lka5 , very discouraging that current administration workers are denying their comments in Woodward's book. But, I suppose they have no other option if they want to carry on. They must be justifying their actions to themselves by reasoning that this is the only way they can continue to restrain/constrain Trump as best they can. They have got to be feeling morally bankrupt on many levels. The NY Times anonymous Op-ed confirms this. I wrote the above before I was aware of this new piece of the puzzle. What a sh*tshow!
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 5, 2018 20:10:19 GMT
The JA is in a tailspin about the Woodward book. LOL! His head with that floppy orange hair must be about to explode.
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 5, 2018 23:17:39 GMT
NYT Op-Ed piece . . . WOW!!!
|
|
|
Post by lani on Sept 6, 2018 13:35:56 GMT
House Rep. Austin Scott (R-G) has proposed an idea for a resolution that party members be punished for not voting along party lines - specifically committee chairs and members could find their positions in danger. How 'bout them apples?
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 6, 2018 13:44:38 GMT
"The root of the problem is the President's amorality." -- from the now infamous NYT Op-Ed piece That's a very powerful statement. When I read it I wasn't sure what the difference was between amoral and immoral, and wondered why the author chose to use amoral. So I looked up the definitions of both (maybe you already knew the difference, but I didn't). Here's what I found: "amoral/ immoral. Both have to do with right and wrong, but amoral means having no sense of either, like a fish, but the evil immoral describes someone who knows the difference, doesn't care, and says "mwah ha ha" while twirling a mustache. If you call someone immoral, you are saying that person knows better." So evidently the author is saying that the JA is such a sociopath that while intellectually he knows the difference between right and wrong, he actually has no conscience and simply doesn't care whether something is right or wrong. "Sociopaths know the intellectual difference between right and wrong. They understand society’s expectations. They understand what moral behavior is supposed to look like. They even understand that actions have consequences. The problem is, they do not care. They do not feel remorse or guilt. They have no inner compass to guide them, and so they do exactly what they want at any given moment. This lack of conscience means that it does not matter to them if they trample on the rights, feelings, or safety of others. It means that they have no limits and are therefore capable of anything; it is a recipe for endless cruelty and depravity." -- from this website www.psychopathfree.com/articles/understanding-how-sociopaths-think-why-it-is-good-to-ask-why.278/Sounds exactly like the JA, right?Is this all the beginning of the end for the JA? His followers who have drunk enough of the Kool-Aid will never believe anything negative about him. But those who only drank a few sips, will they begin waking up and realizing what he truly is? I hope so. What do you think?
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 6, 2018 13:45:56 GMT
House Rep. Austin Scott (R-G) has proposed an idea for a resolution that party members be punished for not voting along party lines - specifically committee chairs and members could find their positions in danger. How 'bout them apples? That's absolutely disgusting, and very scary!
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 7, 2018 12:26:08 GMT
The JA tells supporters if he gets impeached it will be their fault because they didn't get out and vote in the mid-terms. Ha! From his lips to God's ears! I wish they'd all stay at home. However, if he gets impeached the fault won't be on his deluded supporters. The fault will be squarely on him, something he will never be able to accept. In his own mind, he can do no wrong. Everything is always someone else's fault, unless he considered it good and then it's all because of him even if he was thousands of miles away and knew nothing about it. This guy makes Richard Nixon look like a choir boy in comparison. Nixon at least was intelligent and while his loyalty was primarily to himself he did have some love of country smoldering inside. But the JA, he has no love at all for anything or anyone but himself. He is just pure evil. There's no good to be found within him at all no matter how deeply you search.
Why doesn't W come out and take a strong stance against him? We all know he is not a fan. W would have nothing to lose, and while the most deluded followers would never believe anything other than the JA line there are many Republicans who would follow W's lead. So is he too busy painting self-portraits or is his loyalty so strongly tied to the party that he won't do anything more than poke a little bit every once in awhile, but never very directly and certainly not with any frequency. Where's the patriotism of all the former leaders of the Republican party? We know the current leaders have already sold their souls.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2018 12:36:47 GMT
So, if one is to be punished for not voting along party lines, wouldn't that mean we live in a dictatorship rather than a democracy? I think Rep Scott needs a refresher course on how our government works!!!...There sure are some idiots out there representing their states.
Joyce, who is W? I just woke up, so am little rum dum yet LOL...
Its Friday. Friday seems to be a huge breaking news day anymore. I wonder how this day will end.
|
|
|
Post by doordie50 on Sept 7, 2018 13:49:19 GMT
Now Rand Paul, "Mr. Libertarian" himself, is actually pushing for lie detector tests and signed affidavits for all senior aides. You can't make this sh!t up!
If Scott's resolution were seriously proffered, the number of Independents would swell.
|
|
|
Post by lani on Sept 7, 2018 14:46:01 GMT
@lka5 , George W. Bush
|
|
|
Post by nashville11 on Sept 7, 2018 15:24:22 GMT
It seems everyone who sits on the right side of the aisle in Congress has gone totally bonkers! Is there something in the water?! If left to them, they'll all follow the JA off a cliff and pull the entire country right behind them. Lie detector tests, must vote with your party, good grief! Total lunacy!
Yes, Linda, I was referring to President George W Bush. Actually either President Bush could come out and have some sway with a portion of the party, but the older Bush may not be up to it. The younger one, however, should still have some clout with a portion of R voters. At least I would think so. For the good of the country, he should at least try but his silence other than an occasional veiled poke tells me that even with nothing personal to lose he still puts party above the country. For Democrats to come out does no good because it's just considered a partisan attack. To really make a difference it would have to be former leaders of the Republican party, because the current leaders have made it clear that they simply don't have the guts.
|
|